Carbon 14 dating maximum age whos the rock dating
And from the slope of the line we can compute the amount of time which has passed since the pool of matter became separated into individual objects.See the Isochron Dating FAQ or Faure (1986, chapter 18) for technical detail.For example, Henry Morris says: He lead to similar results, i.e., a rate virtually identical to the estimated production flux.Another possible escape mechanism is direct interaction of the solar wind with the upper atmosphere during the short periods of lower magnetic-field intensity while the field is reversing.Those which appear the most frequently in talk.origins are reproduced below: Note that these aren't necessarily the "best" or most difficult to refute of young-Earth arguments.However, they are quite popular in modern creation-"science" literature (even though they should not be!(I believe this argument was originally put forth by Mormon young-Earther Melvin Cook, in a letter to the editor which was published in .) But helium can and does escape from the atmosphere, at rates calculated to be nearly identical to rates of production.In order to obtain a young age from their calculations, young-Earthers handwave away mechanisms by which helium can escape.
If the solar system formed from a common pool of matter, which was uniformly distributed in terms of Pb isotope ratios, then the initial plots for all objects from that pool of matter would fall on a single point.
Some of these rocks are sedimentary, and include minerals which are themselves as old as 4.1 to 4.2 billion years.
Rocks of this age are relatively rare, however rocks that are at least 3.5 billion years in age have been found on North America, Greenland, Australia, Africa, and Asia.
The higher the uranium-to-lead ratio of a rock, the more the Pb-206/Pb-204 and Pb-207/Pb-204 values will change with time.
If the source of the solar system was also uniformly distributed with respect to uranium isotope ratios, then the data points will always fall on a single line.